11 Jun 2019 Manchester (United Kingdom)
A comparison of direct reconstruction algorithms in proton CT
Feriel Khellaf  1, *@  , Nils Krah  2@  , J.-M. Létang  3@  , Simon Rit  4@  
1 : CREATIS
Univ Lyon, INSA Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS : UMR5220, Inserm : UMR1206
2 : CREATIS
CNRS
3 : Univ. Lyon, INSA‐Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1206, F69621, VILLEURBANNE  (CREATIS)  -  Website
CNRS : UMR5220, Inserm
7 Avenue Jean Capelle 69621 Villeurbanne -  France
4 : CREATIS
Univ Lyon, INSA Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS : UMR5220, Inserm
* : Corresponding author

Several analytic algorithms have been proposed to incorporate the non-linear path of protons in the reconstruction of a proton CT (pCT) image. This paper presents a comparison between four direct algorithms used in pCT, in terms of spatial resolution and relative stopping power (RSP) accuracy. We have simulated a pCT set up which registers protons individually using Gate, a Monte Carlo simulation tool, with a 200 MeV proton source and two position, direction and energy detectors upstream and downstream from the object. A Catphan 528 phantom and a spiral phantom were imaged to take into account the spatial dependency of the spatial resolution. Each proton's trajectory was estimated using a most likely path (MLP) formalism. The spatial resolution was evaluated using the frequency corresponding to an MTF value of 10%, and the RSP accuracy as the mean value in a homogeneous region. Our results show that methods performing
the backprojection before the filtering offer a better spatial resolution (up to +36%) since each proton is directly binned in the image grid according to its MLP. However, this improvement is minor (+2%) at the center of the object, where the intrinsic uncertainty on the MLP estimate is dominant. Regarding the RSP accuracy, all algorithms but one show equivalent results.


Online user: 1